https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:47730 Wed 25 Jan 2023 14:32:41 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:24248 Wed 16 Nov 2016 17:03:47 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:37845 Tue 18 May 2021 15:48:03 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:40624 Thu 25 Aug 2022 15:24:56 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:52929 n = 606) included people with a lived experience, carers, health care professionals (clinicians) and researchers working in eating disorders. The methodology aligned with the James Lind Alliance priority setting process, which involved oversight by a co-design advisory committee and utilised a national online interim priority setting survey and co-design workshops to identify the top 10 research and translation priorities. Results: The initial national consultations elicited 1210 issues from 480 individuals. From this, 606 participants shortlisted 59 plain language questions in order of personal priority. In total, 16 questions were consistently ranked as important. As a final step, 24 individuals (with equal representation from all 4 stakeholder groups) attended the final prioritisation workshop to co-establish the top 10 research and translation priorities. Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for people with a lived experience, carers, health professionals and researchers to work collaboratively to develop co-designed research and translation activities that address the key areas of early intervention, prevention, understanding the aetiology of eating disorders and effective treatment of people experiencing eating disorders.]]> Thu 02 Nov 2023 09:55:42 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:324 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:42:40 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:28845 litoria aurea, l. castanea, and l. raniformis. there is considerable debate about the role of threatening processes in the decline and uncertainty in how best to develop conservation mitigation strategies for these species. to develop a clear picture of the research priorities necessary to enhance the conservation outcomes for the three species we conducted a literature review to focus on the critical gaps in ecological understanding that prevents consensus, and to set research priorities to address these gaps. Unresolved questions were identified and prioritized, and a set of priority research directions and management actions considered to be integral for the persistence of the species were formulated.]]> Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:33:21 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:46568 Fri 17 Feb 2023 16:26:43 AEDT ]]>